The Nile Basin Development Challenge (NBDC) has identified several challenges to effective planning and implementation of rainwater management (RWM) interventions in its three sites, (Jeldu, Diga and Fogera) located in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Challenges include poor coordination and communication between actors, lack of bottom-up planning and insufficient community participation.
Local level innovation platforms have been established in each site an attempt to work with a range of stakeholders to address these issues. So far, innovation platform members have identified common RWM issues and have designed pilot interventions at a micro catchment scale. However, we need to draw on the lessons learned to design more effective strategies at a larger scale.
In December 2012, researchers from AfroMaison and the Nile Basin Development Challenge co-organized a workshop in Fogera to develop landscape scale strategies for improved rainwater management. The workshop was organized by Mulugeta Lemenih, Beth Cullen, Zelalem Lema and Aberra Adie with assistance from Geraldine Abrami and Emeline Hassenforder.
The aim of the workshop was to use WAT-A-GAME (WAG), a participatory planning tool, as the starting point for looking at RWM issues at a landscape scale.
WAT-A-GAME is an open toolkit developed by IRSTEA and CIRAD which enables participants to design and run simulations for water management, policy design and education. It aims to show how water moves within a landscape, how it is used, polluted, transformed and shared by actors. Using WAG, participants can simulate various actions or strategies and the resulting impact on their household economy, their wellbeing, labor, and the surrounding ecosystem. New policies can also be invented and tested. It can be adapted to individual cases, various land and water management issues and different scales. WAG has been designed to be used by a range of stakeholders, including farmers, scientists, experts, administrators and policy makers. In this workshop WAG was used to model the Fogera catchment and simulate key RWM issues including water availability, run-off, soil erosion and the impact of different land-use practices.
Research conducted by NBDC scientists has highlighted a disconnect between farmers and decision makers in terms of perceptions about NRM problems and ideas for solutions.
This is exacerbated by a lack of communication and understanding between the different actors. In order to highlight these differences participants were separated into two groups of 28 community representatives and 22 decision makers and experts.
For the first two days these groups worked separately to identify and prioritize key issues, identify technical, institutional and policy interventions to address these issues and to incorporate these actions into an integrated strategy.
On the third day, the two groups presented their strategies to one another. This led to knowledge sharing and constructive dialogue about similarities and differences between the strategies, the reasons for this and how they can be merged. The role-playing exercises and subsequent discussions raised awareness about upstream and downstream linkages and landscape interconnectedness. Regional and district staff learned about farmers’ knowledge and priorities, and vice versa.
This was the first in a series of workshops, the next step will be to test strategies developed during the first workshop and work with stakeholders to create an integrated and feasible strategy for the Fogera area that can potentially be implemented. It is hoped that this process will be replicated in the two other NBDC sites over the coming year. The process will be used to share experiences and knowledge between the three sites, as well as between local and national platforms in an attempt to inform policy.
January 22, 2013 at 5:40 am
During the various sessions with this Wat-A-GAME have you included the potential impacts of climate change, and or identified any changes that the communities have already observed?
January 31, 2013 at 8:12 am
Hi Stephen, thanks for your query. We have only held one workshop so far where the game was introduced. Some preparatory work was done beforehand as part of the AfroMaison project to look at future scenarios which included the potential impacts of climate change but this wasn’t something we focused on during the last workshop. Significant changes have been mentioned by farmers in the livelihoods and community engagement work we have done; for example changes in land use practices, vegetative cover, water availability, soil erosion and declining soil fertility in some areas, changes in weather patterns and population increase. Some of these dynamics were incorporated into the game. During the next workshop (scheduled for March) we will be looking in more depth at the issue of ‘unrestricted grazing’ as this has been prioritized by local stakeholders. We are currently thinking about how we can incorporate biophysical information into the game, particularly hydrological data that has been collected as part of the NBDC project, in order to run scenarios. We are ultimately aiming to generate feasible strategies for dealing with challenges that communities in Fogera are facing so it will be important to take into account the changing dynamics of their farming systems. We will be reporting on the next workshop so I can keep you updated with our progress. Do get in touch if you require any more information.
January 25, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Thanks for the nice post and the beautiful pictures beth. Can’t wait to read more in depth report.
January 31, 2013 at 8:16 am
Thanks Geraldine! The report is in progress. Looking forward to the next workshop. Will be in touch.
January 25, 2013 at 5:02 pm
This is a basic feature of using WAG toolkit (see watagame.info). FOr the community observations to be checked with Beth
Nils Ferrand (Leader Wat-A-Game)
January 31, 2013 at 8:25 am
Thanks Nils! I will be writing in more depth about the workshop approach, why we split the stakeholder groups in this way, and the role that such tools and processes can play in dealing with issues of power and representation in the NRM planning and implementation process. I’ll keep you updated.